‘Applying the principles from Rupert Sheldrake’s “A New Science of Life” to Cultural Heritage Disputes.’

Posted on by

Applying the principles from Rupert Sheldrake’s ‘A New Science of Life’ to Cultural Heritage Disputes, e.g. claims for the return of looted antiquities, repatriation claims, and sacred land claims, provides a unique, non-mechanistic lens for resolving deeply entrenched international and identity-based conflicts.

Cultural Heritage Disputes are often locked in deep ‘historical grooves’ of colonial entitlement, defensive legalism, or generational trauma.

Nations or institutions often default to rigid, defensive ownership claims simply because ‘that is how it has always been handled.’

Mediators must recognize this defensive posture as a ‘learned systemic habit’ rather than an unchangeable law. By acknowledging the historical groove, Mediators can guide the Participants (‘P‘s’) to separate past acquisition habits from future collaborative possibilities.

Sheldrake’s theory suggests that once a new behavior is successfully adopted, it becomes easier for others to replicate globally.

Historically, museums feared that returning one artifact would open a ‘floodgate’ of litigation.

Recent high-profile returns, like Germany returning Benin Bronzes to Nigeria, act as a catalyst.

Advocates can use these pioneering agreements to show nervous institutions that restitution does not equal ruin, making compromise feel safe and culturally repeatable.

In Sheldrake’s framework, things are connected to their source across time and space. Cultural objects are not just inert physical matter; they carry profound metaphysical, spiritual, and community connections.

To a Western museum, an object might be a historical specimen. To an Indigenous community, it may be a living ancestor or a vital component of ongoing spiritual health.

Advocates must expand the Mediation table to include these invisible, non-material dynamics. Resolving the dispute requires addressing the emotional and spiritual severing that occurred when the object was removed.

Traditional legal ownership is binary: one side wins, and one side loses. Sheldrake’s worldview favors dynamic, evolving systems over rigid, static mechanics.

Mediators should push the P‘s away from strict ‘all-or-nothing’ property laws.

Co-create creative, fluid solutions that mimic living systems. This includes frameworks like shared stewardship, digital heritage repatriation, rotating international exhibitions, or joint research curatorships where both sides maintain a relationship with the heritage.

Morphic resonance and morphogenetic fields are controversial biological hypotheses proposed by British biochemist Rupert Sheldrake to explain how nature forms shapes, habits, and behaviors. Published in his 1981 book ‘A New Science of Life’, these concepts challenge mainstream science by suggesting that the laws of nature are not fixed, but are more like evolving habits.

The mainstream scientific community largely rejects these ideas as pseudoscientific, citing a lack of reproducible evidence and a conflict with established laws of physics and genetics. However, the concepts remain highly influential in alternative philosophy, holistic psychology, and creative conflict resolution.

What are Morphogenetic Fields?

The word morphogenetic comes from the Greek words morphe (form) and genesis (coming into being).

  • The Concept: Invisible, non-material blueprints that shape atoms, molecules, crystals, cells, plants, and animals.
  • How They Work: DNA contains the instructions for making proteins, but Sheldrake argues it does not explain how those proteins organize into complex shapes (like a specific flower petal or a human hand). Morphogenetic fields act as architectural guides that direct the physical growth and structural layout of living systems.
  • The Scope: Every species possesses its own distinct field. A spider spin web pattern is guided by a spider morphogenetic field, while a quartz crystal is formed by a quartz field.

What is Morphic Resonance?

Morphic resonance is the actual process or mechanism by which these fields transmit information across space and time.

  • The Concept: The transmission of formative influences from past organisms to present ones based on similarity.
  • How They Work: When a member of a species learns a new behavior or takes on a new physical form, that information is broadcasted into the collective morphic field. Other members of that same species can then “tune in” to this field, making it easier for them to adopt the same shape or behavior without direct physical contact.
  • The Radio Analogy: Sheldrake compares a living organism to a television set. DNA is like the physical components of the TV, but the TV cannot produce a picture without tuning into invisible broadcast waves. Morphic resonance is the signal being received by the organism.

To illustrate his theory, Sheldrake often points to anomalies in chemistry and animal behavior:

  • New Crystals: When scientists synthesize a brand-new chemical compound, it is often notoriously difficult to crystallize. However, Sheldrake notes that once a crystal is successfully formed in one laboratory, the same compound suddenly crystallizes much faster in labs all around the world. Mainstream science attributes this to microscopic dust particles traveling in the air or on scientists’ clothing, but Sheldrake claims it is morphic resonance at work.
  • The Blue Tits of Britain: In the mid-20th century, a few blue tit birds in England figured out how to pierce the foil caps of delivered milk bottles to drink the cream. Within a short period, blue tits across the entire United Kingdom and parts of Europe began doing the exact same thing, even in isolated areas where they could not have physically observed or copied other birds.